Science based toxicology
Animal Aid backs important new report promoting non-animal safety
testing
In October 2003, the European Commission presented
its latest proposal for a new EU regulatory framework for the testing
of chemicals. This is part of the EU's plan to test thousands of
substances that have been in everyday use for many years and have
not gone through rigorous safety evaluation.
Its new formula - REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation
of Chemicals) - aims to give industry greater responsibility
for managing risks and providing information, thus shifting the
burden of proof of safety from government to industry.
Implicit in the proposal is the use of millions of animals in lethal
toxicity tests - tests that cause enormous suffering for the victims
and provide no protection for human consumers due to crucial biological
differences between species.
|
|

For further information about the background to this report,
see the EU chemical tests
campaign index.
|
| The proposed EU chemicals testing programme
- is such a vast and heavily backed project that it requires the
most intelligent and focused opposition that can be mustered.
The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection has been at
the centre of the lobbying activity in the EU corridors of power
and has produced two important key documents.
Building on that work is an excellent critique - by French toxicologist
Dr Claude Reiss - not just of the EU REACH programme but also of
the entire animal-based system of safety testing.
Animal Aid believed Professor Reiss's document required a much
wider audience. We have therefore organised - and borne the costs
- for it to be attractively designed, printed and mailed out to
key decision makers throughout the UK and Europe.
Dangerously misleading animal tests
Called Science Based Toxicology: a new strategy for toxic risk
assessment in the 21st century, Dr Reiss's report is now in the
hands of DEFRA and Trade and Industry Department politicians and
officials. It has also been sent to leading figures at all the major
pharmaceutical and chemical companies, and to university departments
teaching a range of science courses - including, biology, medicine
and chemistry.
|
|

2,655,876 animals were used in experiments during 2002 in
the UK alone. Click here for the
full statistics.
|
| Professor Reiss, a molecular biologist
with more than 40 years' research experience, is the author of 120
scientific papers that have been published in international, peer-reviewed
journals. He is the founder and co-organiser of the European Workshop
in Molecular Toxicology.
His simple message is that it is dangerously misleading to use
whole animals or animal tissues in seeking to establish whether
or not a substance can harm people. His methodology is based on
the use of the most advanced technologies to assess the impact of
candidate substances on human tissue.
Professor Reiss's booklet sets out how current animal-based safety
testing methods are responsible for harming and killing huge numbers
of people in the EU and beyond. He analyses why animal tests fail
and sets out a practical and rapid programme for implementing SBT
in the EU.
As well as benefits for the general population, SBT systems promise
gains for the chemical and drug industries by way of the introduction
of testing systems that are more rapid and ultimately cheaper than
animal-based methods.
Click here to read Science
Based Toxicology: a new strategy for toxic risk assessment in the
21st century >>
A printed copy of the report is available free on request by
contacting our Tonbridge office. |
|

The proposed EU chemicals testing programme would involve
the use of millions of animals in lethal toxicity tests. Please
join the campaign against the tests - send
for your campaign postcards today.
|