RUDDY CONSERVATIONISTS!
Sadly,
we find ourselves at odds with another influential organisation whose public
reputation is one of animal protection rather than destruction. I refer to the
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, which is advocating the virtual elimination
of ruddy ducks in the UK to stop them breeding with a rare, close relative in
Spain.
The result of these 'illicit' liaisons, says the RSPB, is an 'impure hybrid'.
We say that shooting thousands of birds in an attempt to preserve the blood
purity of a related species is straightforwardly fascistic. Animal Aid has no
option but to oppose the plan. We did so at the RSPB's recent AGM and attracted
enormous media interest.
Those of us concerned with the rights and welfare of animals thought we could
trust conservation bodies, such as the RSPB, to make all the necessary arguments
in defence of wildlife, while we concentrated on issues such as factory farming,
vivisection and hunting. That's obviously not the case. We see now that there
are too many people in the conservation movement, especially those prominently
placed in the more traditional organisations, whose notion of conservation is
all about trying to regulate population numbers, while looking for scapegoats
for the destructive vices of our own species.
Animal and plant life is under threat around the world because of human being's
reckless, greedy, polluting, all-consuming habits. Yet people are always on
the lookout for an animal to take the rap. Among those currently on the Enemies
List here in the UK are rabbits, foxes, Canada geese, grey squirrels, seals,
gulls, magpies, pigeons, pike, badgers and the ruddy duck.
Invariably, the justification for any actual or proposed cull (i.e. mass slaughter)
is that it serves a vital conservation need. Our job is to argue for a conservation
that is fit for the 21st century - one that is about regulating our own behaviour,
about protecting animal habitat and which shows respect for individual animals.
Find out more about the ruddy
duck campaign.
|