| |
| Home
> Campaigns > Sport
& leisure > Pheasants
> Fowl
Play > Part 2 |
Fowl Play
How pheasants are produced
No reliable figures
Despite the scale of pheasant production and shooting
in Britain, the industry has not troubled itself to develop reliable,
up-to-date information on the number of birds involved. But bearing
in mind past industry data, plus forecasts of sales growth, it can
be estimated that around 35 million birds are released every year.
The release of this enormous 'avian biomass' inevitably has a destabilising
impact on established wildlife populations with whom the pheasants
will compete for food and cover. The natural landscape is also damaged
by this sudden influx.
The 'breeding stock' is typically kept in small pens. Their eggs
are collected, incubated in ovens and the chicks reared in heated
sheds before being moved, aged six or seven weeks, into large 'release
pens'.
Animal Aid has gathered evidence relating to every stage of the
production process, most recently at a state-of-the-art breeding
unit in Powys comprising row upon row of metal pens. Each pen was
just 2ft wide, 4 ft long and 1 ft high and yet incarcerated within
were one cock pheasant and six or seven females. The majority had
been feather-pecked by stressed cagemates, some so severely that
their backs and necks were bare and bloody. This was despite all
of them having been fitted with oppressive 'anti-aggression' face
masks.
|
|

Breeding birds incarcerated in a tiny metal pen and fitted
with 'anti-aggression' face masks.
|
The pens themselves were devoid of any
comfort. The pen floor was wire mesh, the sides were made from solid
alloy and there was a flexible mesh roof. The floor was at an angle
so that eggs could roll through for ease of collection. The pens
were elevated about one metre from the ground and were in tight,
seemingly endless open-air rows. The area covered totalled at least
two acres, or the equivalent of two football pitches.
Predators exterminated
Once hatched, pheasant chicks are moved to heated sheds, each typically
holding one or two hundred birds. Attached to each shed is a small
outdoor covered run, to which the birds have access once they are
considered hardy enough. At seven or eight weeks they are moved
from the sheds to release enclosures - large fenced-in units that
can hold thousands of birds. As the shooting season approaches (it
runs from October 1 to February 1) the birds are encouraged into
fields of cover crops and, come shooting days, beaten up into the
sky to serve as feathered targets.
Throughout the whole process, the pheasants are fed and medicated
- and any animal perceived as threatening their survival is exterminated.
Even after their release, strategically placed feed hoppers entice
the pheasants to remain within the vicinity so that paying customers
are not short of targets. When each day's shooting stops, feed is
used to seduce the survivors back into cover so that they are available
to face the guns on another day.
|
|

Kestrel caught by a Fenn trap illegally set above ground.
Photo credit: Peter Robinson
|
Mutilations and restraints
As indicated, the crowded, unnatural conditions within the sheds
lead to aggression. Gamekeepers attempt to counteract this by a
variety of mutilations and physical restraints. Perhaps the most
severe 'procedure' is 'debeaking'. In its 1997 Report on the Welfare
of Laying Hens, the government's official agricultural
advisory body - known as the Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC)
- stated: 'We consider that beak trimming is a most undesirable
mutilation which should be avoided if at all possible and only used
if essential to prevent worse welfare problems of injurious feather
pecking and cannibalism.' The report adds: '...if beak trimming
is essential, it should be carried out at up to 10 days of age...'
[1]
Despite this clear welfare warning, pheasants may be debeaked repeatedly
in their short lives. The industry lobby group, the Game Conservancy
(GC) has advised: 'The beak will normally grow back again after
10 to 14 days, when a further feather pecking outbreak may occur,
requiring additional treatment. Some game rearers automatically
repeat the beak trimming process at 10-14 day intervals.' [2]
An increasingly popular alternative to debeaking is fitting the
birds with 'bits'. These are incomplete rings of plastic or metal
that are designed to prevent the beak from closing, so minimising
damage from aggressive pecking. Bits are fed between the upper and
lower mandibles and clipped into the nostrils to keep them in place.
According to a supplier of the devices, they commonly cause sinusitis.
Bitted animals are also frustrated in their attempts to pick up
small particles of food.
Gamekeepers also employ spectacles - or 'specs'. These blinker-like
devices, which are also clipped into the nostrils, are designed
to limit their field of vision, thereby reducing aggression. Another
reason for employing specs is to minimise egg eating in breeders.
|
|

Many birds are fitted with plastic 'specs' which are clipped
to their nostrils.
|
| In a further effort to modify behaviour,
birds may be fitted with brails - bands of material looped over
the shoulder of one wing and twisted to keep the wing closed. This
is to prevent escape from unroofed pens. Wing-spreading and preening
are basic behavioural needs. Brailing makes these impossible.
Disease rife
Just as bird-on-bird aggression is a feature of the crowded sheds
and pens, so are bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases. The birds
are liberally dosed with a range of medicinal products in an effort
to limit the outbreaks.
Until recently, the drug dimetridazole (DMZ) was routinely prescribed
for reared pheasants to combat devastating infestation caused by
protozoan parasites. Widespread administration took place even though
DMZ is a suspected carcinogen (cancer-causing substance) and has
been banned in every European Union country except Britain. The
drug is given in the grain feed and water and, while there is a
withdrawal period of 28 days prior to the birds' destruction, the
only protection for the consumer is an inadequate sampling programme
administered by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate.
The veterinary drugs company Merial has now stopped production
of DMZ. It did so when it became clear that the European Commission
was not prepared to continue licensing DMZ for British game birds,
despite the industry's protestations. It is still legal in Britain,
however, to administer the drug to game birds - and the shooting
industry retains stocks that it intends to use.
A particularly graphic picture of life and death in the sheds came
with the June 2004 publication of a League Against Cruel Sports
(LACS) undercover investigation, called Bred To Be Wild. The account
LACS presented - supported by filmed and documentary evidence -
was one of 'cruelty, cannibalism and over-crowding at a number of
game rearing farms across England, with thousands of birds dying
as a result of appalling battery-like conditions and negligence
by staff with little or no formal training in animal husbandry'.
|
|

This male breeder has been feather-pecked despite his female
cagemates having been fitted with face masks.
|
How pheasants are shot
Game birds are released in compact localised areas.
To keep them continually within range for big-spending shooting
customers, cover crops are planted, natural cover is extended, feed
and water is provided and snares and traps are set to combat the
unnaturally large numbers of indigenous predators attracted to the
unbalanced supply of prey.
Pheasants are ground-dwelling creatures of the woodland edge. They
fly badly and briefly. An energy sapping power flap, never lasting
longer than 10 seconds, is followed by a gliding descent. Pheasants
are particularly vulnerable at the start of the season when, having
been carefully preserved by their keepers, the institutionalised
birds are suddenly scared into the sky and shot at. During these
early weeks, they are often seen blundering through hedgerows or
meandering across busy country roads where many meet their death.
Thrill of the kill
Shooting magazines seek to present the slaughter as an even contest
between canny prey and adept hunter. Christopher Graffius of the
lobby group, the British Association of Shooting and Conservation
(BASC) conjured up just such a scenario, when he wrote in the Daily
Telegraph:
"The enjoyment of pheasant shooting lies in being among
friends in beautiful country in pursuit of a testing quarry with
the end result of food on many tables. The thrill is in the pleasure
of a good and challenging shot, much the same as the pleasure taken
in any sport or work well done." [3]
Enjoyable it may be for the armed participants but, from the birds'
perspective, it is a day of bloody carnage. Just as the workers
in the sheds often lack proper formal training, so anyone - even
a child of nine - can pick up a shotgun and, untutored, attempt
to bring down these feathered targets.
|
|

Shed 'dead list'.
|
Untutored guns
There is no compulsory training or examination of shooting skills
in Britain and in several parts of the country young children have
been granted firearms certificates in their own names. Even where
a skilled shooter is involved, the nature of the spread-shot cartridge
cannot guarantee a humane death. Some birds fall alive and flightless
from altitude. The industry's own code demands that they be picked
up by dogs or shoot members and quickly despatched. Many wounded
birds, however, are never recovered, particularly in the undulating
densely covered terrain favoured by shoot operators. If 35 million
birds are released annually and 'just' 5% are hit but not killed
outright, 1.75 million will have faced a slow death by hunger, thirst,
exposure, or at the mercy of predators.
Can it be plausibly claimed that the suffering caused to these
purpose-bred birds was 'necessary'?
Theo Hopkins of Oakford in Devon also wrote to the Daily Telegraph:
"I recently saw a pheasant shot and wounded 40 yards above
the ground. The 2lb bird, flapping and shedding feathers, hit the
ground with an audible thump. It couldn't fly, but tried to run.
A dog grabbed it by the wing and dragged it across the field and
through a dense hedge. The bird and wing parted company. The dog
looked momentarily confused, but then thankfully grabbed the body.
The bird continued to flap around at the Gun's feet awhile, while
he waited for his next shot. Eventually he picked up the bird by
the feet and repeatedly swung its head against a fence post."
[4]
Click here for part 3 of Fowl Play,
which covers the Draft Animal Welfare Bill, the greed and excess
of the pheasant industry (as described in their own words), predator
control, and the environmental impact of pheasant shooting.
|
|

A shooter clubs a downed bird in a protracted attempt to
kill her.
Photo credit: Kevin Hill
|
|
Top ^

|
|
|