DEFRA ACCUSED OF RUDDY DUCK SLAUGHTER COVER-UP
Environment
Minster, Michael Meacher, is this week accused by national campaign group, Animal
Aid, of deliberately concealing from the public the large-scale suffering endured
by thousands of ruddy ducks in a recently-completed government-commissioned
'trial cull'. The killing - part of a sick 'genetic cleansing' operation - was
to test the feasibility of eradicating the entire UK ruddy duck population.
Ducks were slaughtered on their nests and in wintering grounds by Ministry-appointed
gunmen.
A report just submitted to Meacher's DEFRA ministry by the Central Science
Laboratory in York - to whom the killing was contracted - has revealed that
2,651 ruddy ducks have been killed in the 'regional cull' leaving a surviving
population of over 3,000 ducks. The cull that ran from April 1999 until May
this year was centred on the West Midlands, Anglesey and Fife. The government
was urged to proceed with the slaughter programme by the RSPB and Wildfowl &
Wetlands Trust, on the grounds that some of the birds - an American import -
were flying to Spain to mate with endangered white-headed ducks who had been
hunted to near extinction. This resulted in an 'impure' hybrid, which wouldn't
be tolerated by top table conservation groups.
In an earlier rehearsal for the recently-completed slaughter, a sizeable percentage
of ruddys took hours to die, with some having to be shot numerous times. Others
were injured and never retrieved. The newly published report fails conspicuously
to offer any detail of the carnage. And, despite an assurance by DEFRA that
welfare considerations would be taken into account, the report carries no word
on the subject.
With around 50% of landowners refusing the ministry-appointed gunmen access
to their land on which ducks were resident, DEFRA is now considering invoking
draconian measures to gain compulsory access. Animal Aid will be contacting
these landowners to offer support to those wishing to protect their ducks, offering
guidance to those who are unsure, and reassuring those already involved in the
cull that it is not too late to disassociate from it.
Says Animal Aid director Andrew Tyler:
"The whole scheme is callous, cynical and anti-democratic.
To overcome the enormously complicated logistics of this cull will cost millions
of pounds of taxpayers money - ruddy ducks disperse and dive when under threat
and are located on as many as a 1,000 sites. A special licence to gain compulsory
access to land would have to be sought - all very reminiscent of the botched
foot and mouth slaughter."
There have been no previous avian eradication schemes in the UK or on mainland
Europe. The ruddy duck programme could, therefore, serve as a pilot study for
future attempts to eradicate non-native bird species. The original objective
of the cull was to assess the feasibility of total eradication. Three years
on, however, it is claimed that the original intention was to assess the feasibility
of achieving a 95% reduction - could this already be an admission of failure?
.........................
Notes to Editors
- More information from Elaine Toland or Andrew Tyler on 01732 364546.
See also campaign history
and factfile here.
- We have an ISDN line for broadcast-quality radio interviews.
|